Conceptual Analysis of Moderator and Mediator Variables in Business Research

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Distinguished professor of Accounting, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant professor of Accounting, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student of Accounting, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

10.22034/iaas.2023.190956

Abstract

The major purpose of this article is to expand the domain of the business research by providing conceptual analysis of the moderating and mediating variables and exploring their potent effects in business research. To provide specific implications, Kang et al. (2015) model with respect to Balanced Scorecard technique is conceptually extended. Theoretical foundation of the moderating, mediating, and their major distinctions along with appropriate statistical tests applicable to each situation are also provided. The model is also extended to analyzing interaction effects of Mediated-Moderation and Moderated-Mediation designs and their testing. The article concludes that: 1) the nature of complex business problems will be more transparently captured by considering moderating and mediating variables, 2) without specifying moderating and mediating variables, business models are incomplete and therefore are not able to solve real business obstacles. Lack of inclusion of moderating and mediating effects is one viable reason which indicates why most business models do not function in real practice, 3) moderating and mediating variables are widening the scope of the prevalent business theories, and 4) moderating and moderating variables makes it possible to respond to the inquiries regarding “when” “how” and “why” a particular relationship exists between the independent and dependent variables. Hence, this study posits great impacts in future correlational and experimental studies in business.

Keywords

References

  1. اسدی، غلامحسین و رضایی، مصطفی. (1390). "تاثیر پیاده‌سازی ارزیابی‌متوازن(BSC) بر عملکرد بنگاه (مطالعه موردی)". نشریه تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، انجمن حسابداری ایران، 3 (10)، 56-71.
  2. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, London, Sage.
  3. Aroian, L. A. (1944/1947). “The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables”. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.
  4. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  5. Box, G. E. P. (1976). “Science and Statistics”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791-799.
  6. Edwards, J. R., Lambert, L. S. (2007). “Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis”. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.
  7. Farooq, A. and Hussain, Z. (2011). “Balanced scorecard perspective on change and performance: A study of selected Indian companies”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 754-768.
  8. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., Barron, K. E. (2004). “Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115-134.
  9. Fritz, M. S., MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). “Required sample size to detect the mediated effect”. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239.
  10. Goodman, L. A. (1960). “On the exact variance of products”. Journal of the American statistical association, 55(292), 708-713.
  11. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  12. Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D. (2010). “A general approach to causal mediation analysis”. Psychological Methods, 15, 309-334.
  13. Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., (1981). “Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations”. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.
  14. Kang, J-S, Chiang, C-F, Huangthanapan, K. and Dowing, KS. (2015). “Corporate social responsibility and sustainability balanced scorecard: The case study of family owned hotels”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 48, 1 24-134.
  15. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system”. Harvard Business Review, 74 (1), 75-85.
  16. Karabulut, A. T., (2015). “Effects of innovation types on performance of manufacturing firms in Turkey”. Proceed a-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1355-1364.
  17. Kenny, D. A. (2014) “Mediation”. http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
  18. Kenny, D. A., Judd, C. M. (2014). “Power anomalies in testing mediation”. Psychological Science, 25(2), 334-339.
  19. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In the handbook of social psychology ,Vol. 1, 4th ed., (pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  20. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). “Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods”. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
  21. MacKinnon, D. P.; Lockwood, C. M.; Lockwood, J. M.; West, S. G.; Sheets, V. (2002). “A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects”, Psychological Methods, 7 (1), 83–104.
  22. Muller, D.; Judd, C. M.; Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). “When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 852–863.
  23. Namazi, M., & Namazi, N. R. (2016). “Conceptual analysis of moderator and mediator variables in business research”. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 540-554.
  24. Namazi, M., Shokrollahi, A., Sadeghzadeh Maharlui. M. (2015). “Detecting and ranking relative importance of various determinants of the free cash flow risks via neural networks technique”. Journal of Business Research, in print.
  25. Niresh J. A., Velnampy, T. (2014). “Firm size and profitability: A study of listed manufacturing firms in Sri Lanka”. International Journal of Business and Management, 9( 4) ,57-64.
  26. Pearl, J. (2001). “Direct and indirect effects, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence”. Morgan Kaufmann, 411–420.
  27. Pivato, S., Misani, N. Tencati, A. (2008). “The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food”. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17 (1), 3–12.
  28. Preacher, K. J., Selig, J. P. (2012). “Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects”. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77-98.
  29. Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., Zhang, Z. (2010). “A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation”. Psychological Methods, 15, 209-233.
  30. Preacher, Kristopher J.; Hayes, Andrew F. (2008). “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models”. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–891.
  31. Ro,H. (2012). “Moderator and mediator effects in hospitality research”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31,952-961.
  32. Robins J. M., Greenland S. (1992). “Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects”. Epidemiology, 3, 143-155.
  33. Selig, J. P., Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. June, Available from http://quantpsy.org/.
  34. Shrout, P. E., Bolger, N. (2002). “Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations”. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
  35. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982. Washington DC: American Sociological Association.
  36. WU, H. C., KO, J. Y. (2013). “Assessment of service quality in the hotel industry”. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality& Tourism, 14, 218- 244.
Accounting and Auditing Studies
Volume 12, Issue 48
January 2024
Pages 5-26

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics